The Dark Side of the Vote: Biased Voters, Social Information, and Information Aggregation Through Majority Voting1
نویسندگان
چکیده
We experimentally investigate information aggregation through majority voting when some voters are biased. In such situations, majority voting can have a “dark side,”that is, result in groups making choices inferior to those made by individuals acting alone. In line with theoretical predictions, information on the popularity of policy choices is beneficial when a minority of voters is biased, but harmful when a majority is biased. In theory, information on the success of policy choices elsewhere de-biases voters and alleviates the ineffi ciency. However, in the experiment, providing social information on success is ineffective and does not de-bias voters. JEL-codes: C92, D7, D02, D03
منابع مشابه
The Dark Side of the Vote : Biased Voters , Social
The Dark Side of the Vote: Biased Voters, Social Information, and Information Aggregation Through Majority Voting by Rebecca B. Morton, Marco Piovesan and Jean-Robert Tyran* We experimentally investigate information aggregation through majority voting when some voters are biased. In such situations, majority voting can have a “dark side,”that is, result in groups making choices inferior to thos...
متن کاملThe Dark Side of the Vote:Biased Voters, Social Information, and Information Aggregation Through Majority Voting
We experimentally investigate information aggregation through majority voting when some voters are biased. In such situations, majority voting can have a “dark side,”that is, result in groups making choices inferior to those made by individuals acting alone. In line with theoretical predictions, information on the popularity of policy choices is beneficial when a minority of voters is biased, b...
متن کاملInformation Aggregation and Strategic Abstention in Large Laboratory Elections
Recent advances in voting theory have shed light on the influence of pivotality on voter choices when voters have asymmetric private information, and the implications of this for information aggregation in committees and elections. Of particular interest is the result that voters may optimally choose to vote contrary to their own private information, even in committees or elections where all vo...
متن کاملکیفیت نهادها و ترکیب مخارج دولت: یک الگوی نظری
This paper investigates the effect of redistributive politics on the composition of government expenditure. By applying a dynamic and complete information game, it is shown that the quality of institutions is a key determinant of how much the government revenue is spent on public goods. The main finding of this paper is that in democracies with high quality of institution, less transfer is dem...
متن کاملCheap Talk and Collective Decision-Making: Voting Rules and Informed Decision Makers
We investigate a cheap talk model with a collective decision making. In our model multiple decision makers vote on a proposal which determines their payoffs, and an expert tries to persuade them to choose the outcome she prefers. We allow decision makers to possess not all but some of information regarding the state of nature, which determines the gross utility of them based on the voting outco...
متن کامل